Ann Coulter Correctly Calls Out The Far Left’s Hypocrisy When It Comes To Radical Islam

From her blog:

With the media, you’re an “American” when you commit the worst mass shooing in U.S. history, an “Afghan” when you’re applying to college. You’re an “American” when you shoot up the San Bernardino community center, a “Pakistani” when you’re offended by Trump’s remarks. You’re an “American” when you slaughter troops at Fort Hood, a “Muslim” when you realize the Army can’t fire you.(Correction mine – her original statement was “when the Army realizes it can’t fire you”.)

So true.

She also points out how reporters continue to be unrepentantly dishonest when it comes to reporting Trump.  For instance, claiming that Trump said Omar Mateen was born in Afghan (pointing out Trump’s lack of knowledge of geography), when in fact what he said was that Mateen was “born an Afghan” meaning born with the same anti-American sentiment that clearly Mateen’s father and mother – both Afghans – also espoused.

She also points out how another Liberal reporter claimed that Trump is asking for a pat on the back in his tweet when he clearly stated that he didn’t – he wanted vigilance and smarts.

She closes with “…reporters aren’t quoting Trump and have to hope you won’t read the speech for yourself.”  So true.

I’m no Trump fan, but I’m a Hillary fan even less.  If forced to choose between the two, however, I’m confident that Trump would put the right people in the right place to do the right thing.  He’d find the best Chief of Staff, the best Attorney General, the best whoever not based upon politics, but their brains and their results.  Who will Hillary pick?  Only cronies who will lie for her and help line her pocketbooks (and that of the corrupt Clinton Foundation) at the same time.

It’s upsetting that the American electorate has left us with these two choices as President, but that doesn’t relieve the media from their job of at least ACCURATE reporting – even if it isn’t fair – so that the rest of America that isn’t comprised of celebrity-fawning Democrats or “God Hates Fags” Republicans can make a proper decision on who should lead America through its next four years.

Leftist Losers Want To Credit the Anti-Hillary Sentiment to Misogyny

I’m reading an article in the Sacremento Bee in which the writer chalks all this anti-Hillary sentiment up to misogyny.   After all, he argues, Trump lies and Reagan lied so what’s the big deal if Hillary does?

And it’s not Hillary cheating, it’s Bill who has, and Hillary has been honest about it.  Maybe she loves him so much that she forgives him, but enabling him?  Not necessarily.

All fair points, but they hardly lead to the conclusion that animosity towards her must be simply sexist. Not only is a statement like that intellectually dishonest, it shows just how lazy today’s journalists have become where any sort of fact-checking or investigation is concerned.

So why do I despise Hillary Clinton as a candidate?  It has nothing to do with her gender.  It has to do with what she lied about, why she lied, and how she’s tried to cover it up.

Let’s start with her email server.  The NY Post reveals 5 immediate (and illegal) lies that Hillary told regarding her server once the FBI got ahold of it, but take a step back from all the details for a moment and admit that Hillary had in fact sent classified and top secret emails, had numerous unlawful emails with Sid Blumenthal re: Libya and other matters… and then deliberately tried to delete these emails in order to try and cover it up.   What’s worse: the lie or the cover-up?  One could say both, but the media has done very little to call her out on the cover-up, which to me is what’s truly both arrogant and even criminal here.

And Benghazi.  She tried to spin a lie so that her friend and boss (Obama) could continue with the narrative that the war on terror was over, and Republican concerns about security and terrorism were overblown.  Worse, though, she knowingly also lied to the parents of the deceased.  “What difference does it make?”  Indeed.

And her as an entitled, establishment candidate being in the pocket of Wall Street?  Evidence of this is everywhere.  Now, do I dislike that she got paid millions by big banks for her speeches?  Not necessarily, but to try and hide that, and also misdirect and spin on the one hand while saying she’s down in commoner-land with the rest of us?  F-you.  Hillary’s full of shit on being “transparent” like she says she is, and if there’s any question as to who her friends are, here are all Hillary Clinton’s Speaking Fees After Leaving Office in 2015.

And after all that, yeah – there’s finally all the lies.  All her flip-flops on gun control, gay marriage, and her fake accents.  On their own they’d be laughable/pathetic like Trump’s “John Miller”, but here she clearly shows that she’ll lie and try to say absolutely anything to get elected, and without shame.  This includes, btw, playing the “gender card” and insulting women everywhere by doing so.  No wonder even women are getting tired of her, especially now that all her blatant lies are going viral:


I don’t “hate” Hillary Clinton as a person, because I don’t know her as a person.  I despise her as a candidate, however, because I think she is a panderer who doesn’t care one bit about the people she pretends to be out there for.  Not only does she lie, I believe she honestly thinks that the general public are stupid enough not only to believe it, but carry it forward for her – just like this idiot reporter at the Sacramento Bee has.


Review of Kirsten Powers’ “The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech” by AmericanThinker

I recently read Kirsten Powers’ new book, “The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech” and it was a refreshing read, to say the least.  Even if some don’t want to (or wouldn’t) pay for such a book, they should at least read the first chapter available for free online – it is bang-on in my opinion.

For one, Powers calls out the wimpy, “Fair Share” Liberal left for equating free speech to actual violence, such as how a female pro-choice college professor will say that she felt “unsafe” or that she was “being harmed” when pro-life demonstrators were having a peaceful rally on her campus or how a well-known feminist blogger tried to claim that she had PTSD from all the negative tweets she was receiving.

Is the far right without blame on this matter?  Hardly, but at least the far right tries to engage in an argument first rather than silence their opposition (even if the far right’s arguments are weak ones).  And at least the far right knows how to fight and has the guts to.  The far left are such wussies that even when they’re speaking with their own kind they need “safe rooms” and “trigger warnings” in order to get their oh-so-fragile sensitivities through even the conversation.  Thankfully in the midst of all of this, there’s finally a woman from the left like Powers with the guts to call them out and take them on.  Even her first chapter, line-by-line, is solid truth and those on the left should take heed.

Some excerpts:

If a college student is going to be traumatized by The Great Gatsby, then they are going to find day-to-day life unbearable once they step outside the child-care programs that are passing for universities today.

“Dissent from liberal orthodoxy is cast as racism, misogyny, bigotry, phobia, and, as we’ve seen, even violence. If you criticize the lack of due process for male college students accused of rape, you are a “rape apologist.” End of conversation. After all, who wants to listen to a rape lover? People who are anti–abortion rights don’t care about the unborn; they are misogynists who want to control women. Those who oppose same-sex marriage don’t have rational, traditional views about marriage that deserve respect or debate; they are bigots and homophobes. When conservatives opposed the Affordable Care Act’s “contraception mandate” it wasn’t due to a differing philosophy about the role of government. No, they were waging a “War on Women.”
Kirsten Powers, The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech

“In a burst of refreshing honesty, Mary Frances Berry, an African American and former chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights under President Bill Clinton, wrote in a Politico online discussion: “Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats.” Berry, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, added, “There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.”

“Liberals are supposed to believe in protecting minority views, even when they disapprove of those views. Instead an online mob of presumably “liberal” people tweeted about Eich’s donation, many calling him a bigot and homophobe for supporting Prop 8. Remember, this proposition passed the same year Senator Barack Obama sat in Rick Warren’s church to explain his religious based opposition to same-sex marriage.”

If you want to check our Kirsten talking about her book, here she is on Fox News:

David Gayvert over at TheAmericanThinker offers a great review of Powers’ book, too, in my opinion.  Head over there and check it out if you like.

Either way, I’d highly recommend it as a quick and yet contemplative read.

Gloria Steinem Joins Shane Smith’s “Vice”

I’ve long been a fan of Shane Smith’s “Vice” and its hard-hitting (even if left-leaning) style.  The NY Times has announced that Gloria Steinem is set to join the crew.

I think this is fantastic.  While I do not buy or believe in much of the perpetual victimhood and loserism that is often heard coming from the feminist left, nonetheless I believe in the education, discussion, and debate.

Gloria Steinem is strong and outspoken.  Smith’s “Vice” is strong and outspoken.  I believe the two will be a great pair and I look forward to what comes of the pairing.

“Fair Share Liberals” Are Deliberately Greying the “Illegals are Rapists & Criminals” Issue, Even on FOX News

I’ve watched the uproar over Trump’s Presidential Run speech for over a week now.  I’ve known that his comments were populist and sensationalist, but I’ve also watched how they’ve been taken out of context and used by Fair Share Liberal idiots to further their pro-illegal immigration cause.

Even on Fox News, the ever-Liberal Jerry Rivers (ahem “Geraldo Rivera”) is arguing that immigrants “actually commit less crime than natural-born Americans do.”

My question to Geraldo and all the FSL idiots out there – who’s questioning the work ethic or criminal intentions of those who are in this country LEGALLY?  No one.

The issue is about ILLEGAL immigrants, and what they’re bringing to the country. On that topic, Geraldo will go on and on about how they’re such hard workers lining up at Home Depot, but the fact is that THEY SHOULDN’T BE HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE.  That’s first.

Second is, Geraldo, what ELSE are they?  They’re undocumented, so how do you know what their criminal past is?  Fact is, you don’t.

Third is, the government was trying to hide/skew race and legal status statistics.  What we’re finding is that an overwhelming majority are illegals.

Fourth is, let’s look at the recidivism rate of illegals convicted of crimes here and released. Out of 8,000 that were monitored, apparently 2,000 recommitted.

Last is, let’s get back to exactly what Trump was referring to: that according to numerous sources, at least 80% of women crossing the border are being raped and abused – and girls as well.  Illegals living in “sanctuary cities” having been arrested and deported as many as five times are shooting innocent Americans in random shootings, or beating their wives with hammers. There are multiple arrest warrants that are never honored. Again – THESE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT HAVE EVER BEEN HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE, and yet all Fair Share Liberal idiots everywhere disagree.  Worse, they (and only they) would somehow give these rapes a free pass and instead put all their whining, effort, and focus into whether or not some hotel mogul is able to sell his ties in a Macy’s.  This is not only how ridiculous Fair Share Liberals are, but also how damaging they are through their selective ignorance and apathy.

Once again, their cognitive dissonance combined with White Guilt leaves FSL’s in a state of utterly stupid, and innocent Americans (and their families) are paying the price.

An Amazing Thing – “Fair Share” Liberal Apathy On The Subjects of Rape and Violence

What is a “Fair Share” Liberal (FSL), or more apt a Fair Share Liberal Hypocrite? (FSLH)  Either is an idiot liberal, often burdened with “White Guilt”, who believes that they themselves are paying their “fair share” and that everybody else should, too, but when you get down to it believes that everyone else should be paying more and doing more than they are.

Cognitive Dissonance is the hallmark of a FSLH, trying to cling to two totally opposite beliefs at the same time and producing an infinite number of ridiculously hypocritical contradictions on the other, which include but are not limited to the following:

  • They believe they are paying their “fair share”, but deep down that someone else should be paying more.
  • They believe any sort of violence is “senseless”, yet they themselves become horribly violent the moment someone simply offends their sensitivities.
  • They pretend to be against capitalism, yet they’ll quietly reap the benefits of it in almost all of its forms, such as iphones, laptops, TV’s, cheap clothes, cheap gas, nice cars, etc..
  • FSL’s believe in “freedom of speech”, but they’ll be the first to try to ban or shout down a speaker they don’t like.
  • They’ll talk about equal opportunity, yet their focus and their demands are around equal outcomes.
  • “Action” to them means hitting an “Enter” key.
  • They’ll say they hate religion, yet they’ll only go after Christianity.
  • They’re against genocide but only when they think George Bush is (still) committing it.  Otherwise, it’s fine and not America’s problem.
  • They’re against the kidnapping of aid workers, unless those aid workers are Christian.
  • They’re again child rape, unless the rape victims are Christians.
  • They’re against war, unless that war is against Jews or Christians.

And this one really gets me: that they’ll turn a blind eye against all that they say they hate or opposed to if their “higher causes” are being satisfied.

Example: Al Sharpton is a fraud and a tax cheat, even ripping off his own people. That’s OK in a liberal mind, though, because he’s a “civil rights activist”.

The Government can have tons of debt so long as they’re not the ones paying it.  They can have billions in waste so long as they’re not cutting back the departments they like, either.

The IRS can illegally delete emails about targeting so long as the IRS was targeting the Tea Party and not them.  ACORN’s executives can embezzle millions without punishment because they say they’re helping black people.  Hillary Clinton can wipe out emails and stonewall law enforcement because she’s a woman in a man’s world and the first woman with a chance at the Presidency.

The list goes on and on, but perhaps the biggest thing that bugs me about “Fair Share” Liberal Hypocrites is what occurs when two of their own liberal beliefs collide, such as we’re seeing with the matters of Illegal Immigration and Rape.

Let me explain:

An FSLH is all for Illegal Immigration. With that, they choose to assume that all (OK, most) Illegal Immigrants are decent, hard-working individuals and that all who are coming here just want that fair chance that everyone should get. They’re also, of course, against rape.  So against rape they are that then false accusations should be treated as gospel and not only that, but the fake rape victim should even be lionized and treated like a celebrity.

OK, Did you catch where I just said a lie?  It was where I said FSL’s are actually against rape.  Thing is, they’re not.  They say they are, but they’re actually not.  See, FSL’s hate Christians, so if a Christian woman gets raped, that’s fine.  Actually, even if it’s a Muslim woman she can be raped and that’s fine, too, if she’s a Conservative.  If that’s the case, then FSL’s won’t stick up for her and may even make death threats to the victim themselves. This is the stupidity and overall harm that occurs when Liberal beliefs collide in the Liberal mind.

I’ll give you another example.  All FSL’s hate George Bush.  They hate him so much that they voted in everything they thought would be opposite to Bush back in 2008 in Barack Obama.  Bush is white. Obama is black.  Bush is short, Obama is tall.  Bush likes country, Obama likes hip hop.  Bush couldn’t put two sentences together properly sometimes, Obama sounds cool all the time.  Bush had political experience, Obama had none.  Apart from killing Bin Laden, Obama has basically helped run the country into the ground, especially where it concerns foreign policy and foreign relations.  Looks like he’s doing a number on the Constitution as well.  This is how stupid and what a disaster FSL’s are – they’ll vote in a total amateur and run their own country straight into the ground; all in the name of “fairness”.

Now back to my main topic: when FSL’s beliefs collide all of their morality, all of their belief in “fairness”, all of their belief in “justice” – all of it – goes right out the window.  My final example: FSL’s will say they hate violence, and hate rape.  Thing is, they hate Israel more, and hate Christians more therefore they will give terrorists like like the Taliban, Hamas, and ISIS a free pass not only on their attacks, but apparently their raping of women and young girls as well.  You see?  FSL’s hate Bush and hate Israel and hate “White Privelege” so much, the minute white girls or Christian girls get kidnapped, the rape of them and violence of them get either a blind eye or a free pass.

Yes that’s a harsh thing to say, but if I’m lying or spinning here then show me where the outrage is on any liberal blog.  Show me, for instance, where the pressure is on Obama to put troops on the ground directly against ISIS specifically for helping these women and children.  You’ll get crickets, that’s it.

And it’s the same regarding Illegal Immigration.  Here FLSH’s are so all for protecting children, all for women’s rights and the sanctity of a woman’s body and her own right to choose.  Yet they’re so PRO Illegal Immigration, once again all their fake morals go out the window.  Proof?  Not a single ounce of political pressure against Obama’s Administration from the left to stop the horrific basic rights abuses against the women and children trying to cross the border.  Better get Macy’s to stop selling that white Christian guy’s ties (Trump’s) in their stores, though.

Ann Coulter calls all of this out in her book, “Adios America!”  She does a great job of calling out our largely “Fair Share”, Hillary-Supporting Liberal Media for hiding facts and then calling everyone a liar on matters of Illegal Immigration and not just rape but a lot of other crimes these illegals commit (as I type this we just had a random shooting of an innocent woman in San Francisco by a shithead that had been deported five times that the city of San Fracisco, FSL Mecca and “Sanctuary City” as it is, let not only stay in their city but roam its tourist areas with a weapon.)

We’ve got a cancer in the world that’s far bigger and more menacing than anything George Bush could have done, and it’s time Fair Share Liberal Hypocrites like Michael Moore and the rest of the Fair Share Liberal Idiot bloggers and citizens out there start to realize it.  They need to get behind what they SAY they believe in as far as women’s rights are concerned and make a choice concerning which right is truly more important to them – the right for these women and children not to be raped, or the right of these illegal border-crossers to rape them on their way to a better life.  And how about the right of American citizen Kathryn Steinle not to get shot and killed by a man who shouldn’t have been there in the first place?  (Incidentally the city of SF said they had “no legal basis to hold the suspect” and the liberal media won’t even say that Sanchez, her killer, was an illegal – only that he was “deported five times”.)

FSL’s hate Israel, they hate capitalism, and they are blindly pro-Union.  I have to think, then, that way back when they would have supported Hitler, too, turning the same blind eye to the killing of over 6 million Jews and the stealing of all their wealth as they do to the senseless murders of innocents and the stealing of wealth now.  I can’t imagine how far they’d support our modern day version of the Nazi’s – ISIS – if ISIS all of a sudden started to promote a $15 minimum wage?  Dare to dream, hey FSL idiots?

Anyways f#@k ISIS, f#@k Fair Share Liberal Hypocrites, and f#@k their bullshit phony attitudes and morals on things like rape, justice, and equality.  I personally wish every one of them was over in DerkaderkaLand right now taking selfies with their partners in victimhood – those poor souls Bush supposedly “created” called ISIS – so we could at least drone strike the lot of them all in one place; but one couldn’t be so lucky.  Instead, we’ll have to suffer them here even more while we watch the Republicans f#@k it up and let another FSL country-ruiner into the White House.

Hillary Campaigns to be “Champion of Everyday Americans” And Yet Hasn’t Driven A Car in 20 Years

What does driving a car have to do with running a country?  If you’re going to try and pretend that you’re “one of us” and try to tap into the wants and needs of the mainstream public in order to direct and drive policy, then I think it matters a lot.

She’s an elitist. She claims to be a champion of women’s rights and yet willfully and knowingly takes money from countries with the worst women’s rights records on the planet.  Let’s also not forget how she was “broke” (bullshit) and “struggled to pay her MORTGAGES” (Emphasis mine), and how she’s so entitled she needs to have her own email servers separate from the DHS and so entitled that no matter what, it’s completely beneath her to drive.  She’s part of the 1% and gets her money from the 1%, and yet she says she’s going to protect us from the 1%.  Yep, that sounds so much like an everyday American in so many ways I’ve lost count.

Personally, maybe she is a great mother and great grandmother.  I’d guess that she is, actually, a very loving and caring person in her personal life, however as a politician I think she’s a complete piece of $hit and represents the worst of the worst as far as someone “for the people” goes.  To me, she reminds me of just how stupid and gullible our electorate is.

She could very well get elected, though, and when she does do you think Oliver Stone or any Hollywood liberals will make a film about her and her bullshit to try and expose her hypocrisy and shortcomings like they did with “W.”?

Nope, because that is the joke that is liberalism, the hypocrisy of the Democratic base, and the overall idiocy and disillusionment that Hillary will be counting on in her goal of becoming President and even more powerful than she is.  If the everyday American is someone narcissistic, elitist, a 1%er and a populist to the extreme of being a complete and total bullshitter, then absolutely – HILLARY IS THEIR CHAMPION and is their epitome.

Oh, and to my comments about people voting for Hillary just because she’s female?  Yes, people are that stupid and here’s proof amongst our “educated”:

“It seems many students at the University of Washington can’t think of any reason why they should vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 — other than her gender.”