“Fair Share Liberals” Are Deliberately Greying the “Illegals are Rapists & Criminals” Issue, Even on FOX News

I’ve watched the uproar over Trump’s Presidential Run speech for over a week now.  I’ve known that his comments were populist and sensationalist, but I’ve also watched how they’ve been taken out of context and used by Fair Share Liberal idiots to further their pro-illegal immigration cause.

Even on Fox News, the ever-Liberal Jerry Rivers (ahem “Geraldo Rivera”) is arguing that immigrants “actually commit less crime than natural-born Americans do.”

My question to Geraldo and all the FSL idiots out there – who’s questioning the work ethic or criminal intentions of those who are in this country LEGALLY?  No one.

The issue is about ILLEGAL immigrants, and what they’re bringing to the country. On that topic, Geraldo will go on and on about how they’re such hard workers lining up at Home Depot, but the fact is that THEY SHOULDN’T BE HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE.  That’s first.

Second is, Geraldo, what ELSE are they?  They’re undocumented, so how do you know what their criminal past is?  Fact is, you don’t.

Third is, the government was trying to hide/skew race and legal status statistics.  What we’re finding is that an overwhelming majority are illegals.

Fourth is, let’s look at the recidivism rate of illegals convicted of crimes here and released. Out of 8,000 that were monitored, apparently 2,000 recommitted.

Last is, let’s get back to exactly what Trump was referring to: that according to numerous sources, at least 80% of women crossing the border are being raped and abused – and girls as well.  Illegals living in “sanctuary cities” having been arrested and deported as many as five times are shooting innocent Americans in random shootings, or beating their wives with hammers. There are multiple arrest warrants that are never honored. Again – THESE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT HAVE EVER BEEN HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE, and yet all Fair Share Liberal idiots everywhere disagree.  Worse, they (and only they) would somehow give these rapes a free pass and instead put all their whining, effort, and focus into whether or not some hotel mogul is able to sell his ties in a Macy’s.  This is not only how ridiculous Fair Share Liberals are, but also how damaging they are through their selective ignorance and apathy.

Once again, their cognitive dissonance combined with White Guilt leaves FSL’s in a state of utterly stupid, and innocent Americans (and their families) are paying the price.

An Amazing Thing – “Fair Share” Liberal Apathy On The Subjects of Rape and Violence

What is a “Fair Share” Liberal (FSL), or more apt a Fair Share Liberal Hypocrite? (FSLH)  Either is an idiot liberal, often burdened with “White Guilt”, who believes that they themselves are paying their “fair share” and that everybody else should, too, but when you get down to it believes that everyone else should be paying more and doing more than they are.

Cognitive Dissonance is the hallmark of a FSLH, trying to cling to two totally opposite beliefs at the same time and producing an infinite number of ridiculously hypocritical contradictions on the other, which include but are not limited to the following:

  • They believe they are paying their “fair share”, but deep down that someone else should be paying more.
  • They believe any sort of violence is “senseless”, yet they themselves become horribly violent the moment someone simply offends their sensitivities.
  • They pretend to be against capitalism, yet they’ll quietly reap the benefits of it in almost all of its forms, such as iphones, laptops, TV’s, cheap clothes, cheap gas, nice cars, etc..
  • FSL’s believe in “freedom of speech”, but they’ll be the first to try to ban or shout down a speaker they don’t like.
  • They’ll talk about equal opportunity, yet their focus and their demands are around equal outcomes.
  • “Action” to them means hitting an “Enter” key.
  • They’ll say they hate religion, yet they’ll only go after Christianity.
  • They’re against genocide but only when they think George Bush is (still) committing it.  Otherwise, it’s fine and not America’s problem.
  • They’re against the kidnapping of aid workers, unless those aid workers are Christian.
  • They’re again child rape, unless the rape victims are Christians.
  • They’re against war, unless that war is against Jews or Christians.

And this one really gets me: that they’ll turn a blind eye against all that they say they hate or opposed to if their “higher causes” are being satisfied.

Example: Al Sharpton is a fraud and a tax cheat, even ripping off his own people. That’s OK in a liberal mind, though, because he’s a “civil rights activist”.

The Government can have tons of debt so long as they’re not the ones paying it.  They can have billions in waste so long as they’re not cutting back the departments they like, either.

The IRS can illegally delete emails about targeting so long as the IRS was targeting the Tea Party and not them.  ACORN’s executives can embezzle millions without punishment because they say they’re helping black people.  Hillary Clinton can wipe out emails and stonewall law enforcement because she’s a woman in a man’s world and the first woman with a chance at the Presidency.

The list goes on and on, but perhaps the biggest thing that bugs me about “Fair Share” Liberal Hypocrites is what occurs when two of their own liberal beliefs collide, such as we’re seeing with the matters of Illegal Immigration and Rape.

Let me explain:

An FSLH is all for Illegal Immigration. With that, they choose to assume that all (OK, most) Illegal Immigrants are decent, hard-working individuals and that all who are coming here just want that fair chance that everyone should get. They’re also, of course, against rape.  So against rape they are that then false accusations should be treated as gospel and not only that, but the fake rape victim should even be lionized and treated like a celebrity.

OK, Did you catch where I just said a lie?  It was where I said FSL’s are actually against rape.  Thing is, they’re not.  They say they are, but they’re actually not.  See, FSL’s hate Christians, so if a Christian woman gets raped, that’s fine.  Actually, even if it’s a Muslim woman she can be raped and that’s fine, too, if she’s a Conservative.  If that’s the case, then FSL’s won’t stick up for her and may even make death threats to the victim themselves. This is the stupidity and overall harm that occurs when Liberal beliefs collide in the Liberal mind.

I’ll give you another example.  All FSL’s hate George Bush.  They hate him so much that they voted in everything they thought would be opposite to Bush back in 2008 in Barack Obama.  Bush is white. Obama is black.  Bush is short, Obama is tall.  Bush likes country, Obama likes hip hop.  Bush couldn’t put two sentences together properly sometimes, Obama sounds cool all the time.  Bush had political experience, Obama had none.  Apart from killing Bin Laden, Obama has basically helped run the country into the ground, especially where it concerns foreign policy and foreign relations.  Looks like he’s doing a number on the Constitution as well.  This is how stupid and what a disaster FSL’s are – they’ll vote in a total amateur and run their own country straight into the ground; all in the name of “fairness”.

Now back to my main topic: when FSL’s beliefs collide all of their morality, all of their belief in “fairness”, all of their belief in “justice” – all of it – goes right out the window.  My final example: FSL’s will say they hate violence, and hate rape.  Thing is, they hate Israel more, and hate Christians more therefore they will give terrorists like like the Taliban, Hamas, and ISIS a free pass not only on their attacks, but apparently their raping of women and young girls as well.  You see?  FSL’s hate Bush and hate Israel and hate “White Privelege” so much, the minute white girls or Christian girls get kidnapped, the rape of them and violence of them get either a blind eye or a free pass.

Yes that’s a harsh thing to say, but if I’m lying or spinning here then show me where the outrage is on any liberal blog.  Show me, for instance, where the pressure is on Obama to put troops on the ground directly against ISIS specifically for helping these women and children.  You’ll get crickets, that’s it.

And it’s the same regarding Illegal Immigration.  Here FLSH’s are so all for protecting children, all for women’s rights and the sanctity of a woman’s body and her own right to choose.  Yet they’re so PRO Illegal Immigration, once again all their fake morals go out the window.  Proof?  Not a single ounce of political pressure against Obama’s Administration from the left to stop the horrific basic rights abuses against the women and children trying to cross the border.  Better get Macy’s to stop selling that white Christian guy’s ties (Trump’s) in their stores, though.

Ann Coulter calls all of this out in her book, “Adios America!”  She does a great job of calling out our largely “Fair Share”, Hillary-Supporting Liberal Media for hiding facts and then calling everyone a liar on matters of Illegal Immigration and not just rape but a lot of other crimes these illegals commit (as I type this we just had a random shooting of an innocent woman in San Francisco by a shithead that had been deported five times that the city of San Fracisco, FSL Mecca and “Sanctuary City” as it is, let not only stay in their city but roam its tourist areas with a weapon.)

We’ve got a cancer in the world that’s far bigger and more menacing than anything George Bush could have done, and it’s time Fair Share Liberal Hypocrites like Michael Moore and the rest of the Fair Share Liberal Idiot bloggers and citizens out there start to realize it.  They need to get behind what they SAY they believe in as far as women’s rights are concerned and make a choice concerning which right is truly more important to them – the right for these women and children not to be raped, or the right of these illegal border-crossers to rape them on their way to a better life.  And how about the right of American citizen Kathryn Steinle not to get shot and killed by a man who shouldn’t have been there in the first place?  (Incidentally the city of SF said they had “no legal basis to hold the suspect” and the liberal media won’t even say that Sanchez, her killer, was an illegal – only that he was “deported five times”.)

FSL’s hate Israel, they hate capitalism, and they are blindly pro-Union.  I have to think, then, that way back when they would have supported Hitler, too, turning the same blind eye to the killing of over 6 million Jews and the stealing of all their wealth as they do to the senseless murders of innocents and the stealing of wealth now.  I can’t imagine how far they’d support our modern day version of the Nazi’s – ISIS – if ISIS all of a sudden started to promote a $15 minimum wage?  Dare to dream, hey FSL idiots?

Anyways f#@k ISIS, f#@k Fair Share Liberal Hypocrites, and f#@k their bullshit phony attitudes and morals on things like rape, justice, and equality.  I personally wish every one of them was over in DerkaderkaLand right now taking selfies with their partners in victimhood – those poor souls Bush supposedly “created” called ISIS – so we could at least drone strike the lot of them all in one place; but one couldn’t be so lucky.  Instead, we’ll have to suffer them here even more while we watch the Republicans f#@k it up and let another FSL country-ruiner into the White House.

Hillary Campaigns to be “Champion of Everyday Americans” And Yet Hasn’t Driven A Car in 20 Years

What does driving a car have to do with running a country?  If you’re going to try and pretend that you’re “one of us” and try to tap into the wants and needs of the mainstream public in order to direct and drive policy, then I think it matters a lot.

She’s an elitist. She claims to be a champion of women’s rights and yet willfully and knowingly takes money from countries with the worst women’s rights records on the planet.  Let’s also not forget how she was “broke” (bullshit) and “struggled to pay her MORTGAGES” (Emphasis mine), and how she’s so entitled she needs to have her own email servers separate from the DHS and so entitled that no matter what, it’s completely beneath her to drive.  She’s part of the 1% and gets her money from the 1%, and yet she says she’s going to protect us from the 1%.  Yep, that sounds so much like an everyday American in so many ways I’ve lost count.

Personally, maybe she is a great mother and great grandmother.  I’d guess that she is, actually, a very loving and caring person in her personal life, however as a politician I think she’s a complete piece of $hit and represents the worst of the worst as far as someone “for the people” goes.  To me, she reminds me of just how stupid and gullible our electorate is.

She could very well get elected, though, and when she does do you think Oliver Stone or any Hollywood liberals will make a film about her and her bullshit to try and expose her hypocrisy and shortcomings like they did with “W.”?

Nope, because that is the joke that is liberalism, the hypocrisy of the Democratic base, and the overall idiocy and disillusionment that Hillary will be counting on in her goal of becoming President and even more powerful than she is.  If the everyday American is someone narcissistic, elitist, a 1%er and a populist to the extreme of being a complete and total bullshitter, then absolutely – HILLARY IS THEIR CHAMPION and is their epitome.

Oh, and to my comments about people voting for Hillary just because she’s female?  Yes, people are that stupid and here’s proof amongst our “educated”:

“It seems many students at the University of Washington can’t think of any reason why they should vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 — other than her gender.”

From the National Review: Cheryl Mills and Hillary Clinton’s Cover-up Team

More examples of how the Clinton’s believe they’re above everyone, and even the law.
Mills was also involved in an earlier Clinton e-mail scandal. In 2000, the conservative law firm Judicial Watch found while pursuing public-record requests that the Clinton administration had withheld more than 1.8 million e-mails from Judicial Watch’s attorneys, federal investigators, and Congress. Betty Lambuth, a White House computer contractor, testified that White House officials told her to keep the existence of the e-mails a secret and threatened to fire her if she did not. After Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit, Mills admitted she had known that the missing e-mails existed but “assumed” someone else would take care of the issue. When the case finally was resolved by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth in 2008, he found no obstruction of justice but singled out Mills’s behavior as “loathsome.” He found that she had made “the most critical error in this entire fiasco” and that her actions had been “totally inadequate.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415437/clintons-cover-team-john-fund?target=author&tid=902877

Dutch Mayor to DerkaDerkaJihads: “If You Don’t Like Freedom, Then F**k Off!”

Short of a smart bomb that would send these whacko terrorists up to their 70 virgins or whatever, this is how you do it! :)

On live TV, fellow Muslim and Rotterdam mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb said those who do not like freedom can pack their bags and leave.  He also said if they couldn’t handle a cartoon in the newspaper, they should just “f–k off”.  Haha! Brilliant!  Here’s the clip:

Yes, this guy has balls, and you know what Derkas say about balls?

This is the kind of balls that the rest of the world, Muslims and all, have to have with these loser cowards who believe in this day and age that religious laws based upon a bunch of well-crafted fairy tales somehow trump the laws of a civilized society.

Religion can exist just below the law, but never above it, in my opinion, but short of that my opinion is exactly that of the Mayor’s – if you don’t like what we have here in the free world, then simply pack your bags and f-off.  The rest of us are happy being law-abiding citizens and not having the religious wars that for the most part have been over for a millennium.  Evolve much, you backwards, beheading, stone-aged assholes?  Try creating something instead of just destroying it for once, too – the amount of DerkaDerkas receiving any sort of Nobel Prize for anything, or achieving medical or technological advances, or being awarded anything for that matter is pretty slim, and that’s a clue – to your collective levels of intelligence for one, and your overall usefulness in society for another.  You simply beat women, maim children, and waste the rest of our oxygen – that’s it.  Tree moss serves more of a purpose in life, and yet “Fair Share” Liberals somehow think you’ve earned your right to exist?

My hat’s off to this mayor for having the guts that the Obama Administration refuses to even come close to mustering in terms of a direct, no bullshit public statement.  We need more of this kind of speaking out in the world so we can finally start to truly eradicate the problem that is Muslim Extremism.  Now that the good Muslims are finally turning against these guys, I hope we get there soon.

OK “Fair Share” Liberals, now you can start to tell once again me how this problem is all Bush’s fault.

Instead of “Rock the Vote”, How About “Protect The Vote”?

James O’Keefe has struck again, and once again over the issue of Voter Fraud, where apparently poll workers offered ballots to an impostor 20 TIMES as he tried to vote.

Now before both people on the left and the right go nuts over this, let me first state quickly and clearly that according to the article, “No fraudulent votes were actually cast:”  (This means O’Keefe didn’t go as far as to do anything illegal, not that the ‘system works’ as “fair share” liberals will try and claim.)

Either way, as I’ve said before, THIS ISN’T THE PRIMARY ISSUE!!!  Why should we simply leave the option open for an impostor to even ATTEMPT this in the first place?

“Hey, nothing was stolen each time we let these strangers come through our doors, so let’s just keep them open!”  Let’s get people just one step closer to being able to commit fraud?

Voting to me is at the core of Democracy and is a process that shouldn’t be effed with (and yes, this includes gerrymandering which Republicans have often been accused of).  I believe Democrats are being totally disingenuous when saying that Voter ID is a) a non-issue, and/or b) a race issue.  It’s neither.

Ann Coulter on How “Fair Share” Liberals Lie Regarding Race

As controversial as she is, sometimes Ann Coulter nails it as far as “Fair Share” Liberals are concerned and their so-called “data” concerning the poor, race, economics…well, basically everything.

To a “Fair Share” Liberal (i.e. one who feels taking without earning is “fair”), all roads lead to Professional Victimhood in their efforts to try and appease their white guilt.  To support their “plight”, they love to quote what they’d like to think is “unbiased research” to support their positions, yet it’s interesting in the spirit of “fairness” how they’ll reject or deny any research from the other side.  Any evidence that seems to contradict their views, or seems to threaten their must-be-so-fragile causes not only gets rejected, but gets the brunt of their projection as well.  (from Wikipedia: Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude.)

For instance, any economic evidence contrary to their guilt about the poor must be from an “illegitimate” economist.  Any report calling out the political agenda of scientists regarding Climate Change must be “right-wing propaganda” and it seems any report that says black people tend to speed more than white people on a NJ highway must be “racist”.

From Coulter’s blog:

Statisticians, and other people with common sense, tried to explain to liberals that human beings are not identical. Any study purporting to show that too many blacks are stopped for speeding must first determine how many speeders are black.
Being denounced as virtual Klansmen, the state troopers demanded a real study.

Confident that any new study would merely serve to confirm the troopers’ racism, the DOJ and the New Jersey attorney general commissioned a statistical investigation from the Public Services Research Institute in Maryland.

The institute’s study was a spectacular thing. Using expensive monitors with high-speed cameras and radar detectors, they clocked the speeds of nearly 40,000 drivers on the relevant section of the turnpike. Three researchers then examined the photos to determine the race of the driver — without knowing whether the driver was speeding, which was defined as going more than 80 mph in 65 mph zones.

The result: No racial profiling.

Blacks constituted 25 percent of all speeders and they were 23 percent of drivers stopped for speeding. Controlling for age and gender, blacks sped at about twice the rate of whites. The racial disparity was even greater for drivers exceeding 90 mph.

Inasmuch as the study was irrefutable, Mark Posner, a lefty Clinton holdover in the Bush Justice Department, tried to block it from being released, continuously demanding more information.

But no matter how statisticians fiddled with the data, the results were identical: Blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites — and at much higher speeds. The troopers were completely vindicated.

When the study finally leaked — over Posner’s objections — he informed the press it wasn’t “valid” without articulating any actual problems with it. The attorney general of New Jersey, David Samson, nonsensically said the results didn’t matter because New Jersey had already admitted its troopers were engaging in racial profiling.

Perhaps the Times is right and there is no comprehensive study of police shootings by race. But it’s also possible that there is one, it didn’t come out as planned, so it has never seen the light of day.


What I dislike about the race-baiting and race-mongering is that it takes the spotlight off, and the credibility away from, the REAL cases of racism that exist either inside a police department or elsewhere.  Jon Stewart said it right – it may suck for us as white people to have to deal with this as an “issue”, but for many black people true racism is something they live and deal with every day.  White, right-wing bigots with Jim Crow blood still running through their veins do NOTHING to help the issue and only make things worse, but in my opinion, so do “Fair Share” Liberal idiots whose theatrics and p.c. bullshit keep taking away from the real issues that exist.

Fair Share Liberals acting like their points and causes are so fragile that they can’t for an instant stand up to real scrutiny or debate make their causes look manufactured and almost non-existent at worst, and at best provide ammo for right-wing zealots (and bigots) to shoot a thousand holes into every one of their stories, encouraging us all to move on.

Personally, I think this was a big reason why Zimmerman was let go for Martin’s shooting, and why I think the Brown case might not get the justice it deserves as well.  When people see liberal zealots going overboard they seem to tend to give points and support back to the other side.  Although liberals love the “victimhood” aspect of this, it actually harms the victims.

Instead of automatically convicting the cop who shot Brown and doing this big, overblown spectacle of race-mongering, I think they instead should just stow it for a while and try and act “fair and balanced”; confident that the truth and the evidence will be on their side.  Being calm and cool as a cucumber would do much more to show strength in their case and legitimacy of their cause, as would openly inviting any and all contradiction and debate into the argument like Coulter points out in her article.

Otherwise, rushing to judgment and crying “victim” all the time just makes you look weak and either easy to step on, or step over.